All About Deepak Morris

India, scripts, plays, drama, English, theatre, writing, pune,

Category: theater

Discovering sub-text

deepakmorris Posted by deepakmorris at 04:56 PM on August 04, 2009 Comments comments (0)

It's always such a thrill when an actor discovers sub-text.


I've experienced tons of actors who are so focused on showing off [look Mama, I'm on stage!] that exhortations to discover sub-text are lost.


But once in a while comes an actor who listens... who tries it out... and then, there's magic on stage.


Leon found it. Ruchi did. The Khanna sisters were born with it! Sandeep found it. Ananda is another who was born with it. Niloufer found it. Namrata found it. Dalip found it. Naina's a natural at it. So is Gayatri.


In the dark hours, when I think, "Why do I even try?"


Knowing that you guys got it, makes it worthwhile.


Thank you.

What is this animal called Theatre?

deepakmorris Posted by deepakmorris at 02:48 PM on March 20, 2009 Comments comments (0)
Minutes before show time...

The announcement has been made that the show will begin in two minutes...

There's a hush and a palpable energy from the audience. Someone coughs and immediately holds his breath... the show is about to begin...

Backstage, actors wonder if they'll get on stage at just the right moment. No one looks at the script. It's too late, anyway. One goes on or one does not. The cue triggers the action or it does not. The tech rehearsal was awful. The dress rehearsal was worse. Oh God! It's show time! Will we forget whole sections of the script like we did in the dress rehearsal?

And then, magic!

We are no longer actors in the wings, waiting for cues.

We are there, telling the story. There's no question of needing a prompter. The story flows. I forget a line, my co-actor covers and moves the story forward. The antagonist cues up and takes over from my momentary lapse. She hates me in the play but, like me, she wants the story to go forward. It's all about the play. It's all about completing the arc of interest in that scene, then the arc in the act and finally, good triumphs over evil. Or it doesn't. We send the audience home with a nagging question.

But no one can say anything about the acting because there was no acting. We were THERE! We lived the conflict! We laughed, we cried, we were cruel, we were soft. We didn't act it, we were it.

THAT is theatre.

Whether we like it or not, we're all going to die. Why not enrich every moment of our brief existence with the exhilaration that comes from telling the story?

Deepak

Whither Theatre in a FREE world?

deepakmorris Posted by deepakmorris at 05:11 PM on March 14, 2009 Comments comments (0)

Free websites, free blogs, free entertainment, even! The net is a "free-empowering" phenomenon.


You can even download movies for free.


If someone requests a script and I send it to him, there's nothing to prevent him from sending it on to all his friends. I'd go crazy trying to find out who's performed which play and where.


Is this the end of theatre?


I think it's the beginning of a new era in theatre.


The more we get online, the more we feel a need to connect for real. No entertainment can be more real than a theatrical performance. Live actors, on stage, right in front of us. No two performances ever alike! You can even meet the actors, for real, after the performance!


I think the net empowers live theatre even more than patrons did in Shakespearean times.


Deepak

Eliminate the Director!

deepakmorris Posted by deepakmorris at 04:15 PM on August 20, 2007 Comments comments (0)

When I say "eliminate the director," I mean it on the lines of "If You See the Buddha on the Road, Kill Him!"

This means, once the seeker has reached a particular point of development, a teacher is more likely to lead him astray than to guide him. After that point, the seeker must create his own road and, if he sees a teacher on that road, must eliminate him.

What I also mean by "Director" is the "Auteur Director." This is the kind of director most people are used to, someone who carves every bit of the play, telling actors what they must do, how they must do it and how they must say their lines. This is how film directors (at least, 99% of them) still direct movies.

On stage, however, that is stifling for the actor. Granted, in school productions, actors are too young to be able to interpret roles on their own. The Teacher Director must tell them exactly how each line is to be said, the actions they must perform while saying the lines, how they must move from point A to point B, etc.

If this form of direction continues later in life, however, the actor isn't allowed to grow. True development of the personality occurs when the actor learns to look at the role in the context of the scene and the scene in the context of the play and thus, the character in the context of the whole cast. It occurs when the actor gains the confidence to be able to "play with" the character, trying out different interpretations, inserting intellectual input into a creative endeavour.

There is, of course, a kind of director who cannot be eliminated, try as we might. This is the director who forms the "eye of the audience" during rehearsals. This director has a vision of the play and ensures that the actors portray that vision. If an actor misinterprets a role, this director must step in and guide him. However, he cannot do this UNTIL the actor interprets the role, however wrongly.

"Eliminating the Director" is like the quest for perfection; it can never be attained. Similarly, the director cannot actually be eliminated. However, I think it is necessary to work towards that elimination.

Deepak


Welcome. You can browse the website without registering.

Join Rhapsody Theatre

Google Groups
Rhapsody Theatre
Visit this group

Share this site!

Newest Members

Vasundhara Sendeepakmorris